{"id":955,"date":"2013-03-20T18:59:36","date_gmt":"2013-03-21T01:59:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ourlibertyundergod.com\/?p=955"},"modified":"2015-04-14T13:42:13","modified_gmt":"2015-04-14T20:42:13","slug":"who-is-obama-part-3-implementation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ourlibertyundergod.com\/?p=955","title":{"rendered":"WHO IS Obama Part 3 Implementation"},"content":{"rendered":"

“And Moses built an altar and called the name of it, The LORD Is My Banner,”<\/span>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Exodus 17:15<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Continued from, “WHO IS Obama? Part 2: Foundation”<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“I write to you, not because you do not know the truth, but because you know it, and because no lie is of the truth.”<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0 1 John 2:21<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

[IMPORTANT NOTE<\/span>: This Post is in five Parts, published separately, but in close-timing, 3\/2\/2013, <\/strong><\/span>with the exception of Part 5, which was posted on 11\/7\/2013.\u00a0 All can be accessed from the Posts List in the sidebar.\u00a0 Please look for them under the Parent Title, “WHO IS Obama?” and subtitles,\u00a0 Parts 1 –\u00a0 5.]<\/strong><\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

I<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

As the Sky Falls<\/em>
\nall-around us
\nAn enormous ICEBERG<\/span> Rises
\nRearing its fearsome bulk
\nMany facets exposed
\nOur Nation
\nCorrupted<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Evil rears its ugly head
\nHow to STOP
\nThe Destruction?<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

We the American People have tried for five years to pigeonhole<\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

just what is<\/em> Barack Hussein Obama’s political philosophy.\u00a0 Collectivist – certainly!\u00a0 Which common form of collectivist tyranny does he seek:<\/span>
\nSocialism?\u00a0 Communism\/Marxism?\u00a0 Communism\/Leninism?\u00a0 Fascism?\u00a0 islamic Fascism?\u00a0 Black Liberation Social Justice?<\/span>\u00a0 <\/span>OR,<\/span> is it his own –<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Whatever Gets The Job Done?<\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

Whatever the form, it is clear, he intends to rule.\u00a0 Anyone who tells you that you must pay your fair share and advance social justice, knows that SOMEONE MUST RULE<\/em><\/span> in such a society – THAT PERSON INTENDS TO RULE!!!\u00a0 <\/em>[Concept Ayn Rand]<\/span><\/span><\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

“President Obama is proving to be a true disciple of Saul Alinsky (1909-1972), the founder of Community Organizing. Alinsky\u2019s political action philosophy is based on chicanery, deceit, subterfuge, and just plain lying to force social change and financial redistribution. Not surprisingly, it turns out to be humbug \u2014 the product of one who tries to deceive.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“Alinsky doctrine states that ‘an organizer works in and for an open society . . . does not have a fixed truth . . . everything to him is relative and changing.\u00a0 All change means disorganization of the old and reorganization of the new’ (Alinsky, ‘Rules for Radicals,’ 1972).”<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0 [34]<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

~ ~ ~
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

I have quoted David Horowitz’ pamphlet: “Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution, The Alinsky Model,”<\/span> several times.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

David Horowitz speaks from personal experience – his parents were radicals, card-carrying Communists who called themselves “progressives,” [10, p. 18] – and he was a radical, until his daughter helped him see the truth.\u00a0 His intelligence, background and current mission to inform the American People of what we are up against are quite valuable.\u00a0 His pamphlet effectively exposes Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Others’ philosophical foundation and Alinsky’s rules for Implementation of Revolution. [10]<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“To Alinsky radicals, ‘democracy’ means getting those who are in, out.\u00a0 Their goal is to mobilize the poor and ‘oppressed’ as a battering ram to bring down the system.”<\/strong><\/span> [10, p. 11]<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS LITTLE BOOK TO EVERYONE WHO WANTS TO TRULY UNDERSTAND WHERE AMERICA IS RIGHT NOW!
\n<\/em><\/span> [To get copies, see the NOTES Section.]<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Obama, Hillary Clinton and other Progressives’ foundation <\/strong>is inextricably bound in the ideology of revolutionary\/radical Saul Alinsky, 1909-1972.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

~<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

We have<\/em> realized Barack Obama is a “Progressive.”<\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

But, what does that really mean – in his<\/span> mind; in Hillary Clinton’s mind; in Other Progressive minds?\u00a0 <\/strong>Radicals use the term to disguise their collectivist designs for progressively <\/span><\/strong>tearing down society<\/strong><\/em><\/span> to progress toward<\/span> replacing it<\/span><\/em> with <\/strong><\/span>“<\/strong>heaven on earth.”<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

A<\/strong><\/span> second critical question is, are they<\/span> “Moderates?”<\/span> or,<\/span> “Liberals?”<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Let’s let Alinsky tell us himself, through David Horowitz:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“The radical organizer, Alinsky explains, ‘does not have a fixed truth – truth to him is relative and changing; everything<\/em> to him is relative and changing.\u00a0 He is a political relativist.’ 32<\/span> [35, pp. 10-11]<\/span> … Being a radical in the service of the higher good is a license to do anything that is required to achieve that good.”<\/span> [10, p. 44]<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

“Liberals share radicals’ utopian agendas of a just and peaceful world but are hampered because they have scruples.\u00a0 They support radical ends but because they are principled they don’t like the means radicals use to get to their ends.” [10, p. 44]<\/span>\u00a0 [Reiterating the common refrain of the ’60s: “I agree with communism’s goals; but I don’t support its methods.”\u00a0 See Part 2<\/a>.]<\/span>
\n<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

“As a result, Alinsky’s contempt for them is boundless…. ‘while liberals are most adept at breaking their own necks with their tongues, radicals are most adept at breaking the necks of conservatives.’ 33”<\/span> [36] [10, pp. 44-45]<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

“In contrast to liberals, who in Alinsky’s eyes are constantly tripping over their principles, the rule for radicals is that the ends justify the means…”<\/strong><\/span> [10, p. 45]<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

“The most basic principle of Alinsky’s advice to radicals is to lie<\/em> to their opponents and disarm them by pretending to be moderates and liberals…. Deception is the radical’s most important weapon,… Racial arsonists such as Al Sharpton and Jeremiah Wright pose as civil rights activists; anti-American radicals such as Bill Ayers pose as patriotic progressives; socialists pose as liberals.\u00a0 The mark of their success is reflected in the fact that <\/strong>conservatives<\/strong> collude<\/strong> in the deception and call them liberals as well.”<\/strong><\/span> [10, p. 23]<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

A progressive member of the mainstream media, Chris Matthews, has had some interesting things to say about “progressive,” “liberal,” Mr. Obama and Saul Alinsky, that attest to his admiration for both men, and to the deceptive tactics taught by Alinsky.\u00a0 He appears to be a Fellow-Traveller, but, he also appears confused.\u00a0 I’m inclined to believe the heart-to-heart with Socialist Bernie Sanders shows his true allegiance to Alinsky.\u00a0 It seems he is a good example of how effective a man of his vacillations is in view of our<\/em> ignorance of the Progressive\/Radical methods.<\/span>
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

“Why do you think people on the progressive side of things – – that`s the current label used by liberals — I don`t know what`s wrong with the word ‘liberal,’ but if you`re not running for office, I don`t know why you`re afraid of the word. I guess you might be afraid of somebody not voting for you if you`re — some people won`t even use the word ‘liberal’ when they`re writing columns anymore. I don`t understand it.”<\/span> [37]<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Five days later:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n